Agrees with NRC that Vermont Yankee is safe
Jun 14, 2012 | 1253 views | 0 0 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
To the Editor:

On May 23, I attended the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s public meeting in Brattleboro on its annual safety assessment of Vermont Yankee.

Prior to the meeting, I read the announcement from Nuclear Regulatory Commission administrator Bill Dean of the NRC’s findings on Vermont Yankee showing that the plant had once again earned the commission’s highest safety rating of green. It was nice to read an informed, balanced, experienced voice of reason discuss the highly debated issue of whether or not Vermont Yankee is safe.

Dean said “Throughout 2011, our inspectors kept close watch on safety performance at all 104 commercial power reactors operating in the United States. Vermont Yankee was among those that met our clearly defined performance criteria last year. In addition, our inspectors spent time in 2011 verifying that there were no immediate safety concerns at Vermont Yankee, as well as all other US nuclear power plants, following the March events at the Fukushima Daiichi facility in Japan. Those reviews indicated the plants remained safe for continued operation.”

In other words, Vermont Yankee is safe. The agency that is chock-full of nuclear experts, watchdogs, and independent safety inspectors, many of them focused almost exclusively on Vermont Yankee, has looked at the plant, considered the ramifications of Fukushima, and determined that the plant is safe.

After a review based on clear, proven scientific information, not politics and fear, the NRC has given Vermont Yankee the “green light.”

Jim DeVincentis

Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet

Comment Policy

In an effort to promote reasoned discussion, transparency, and integrity in online commenting, The Deerfield Valley News requires anyone posting comments to identify themselves using their real name. Anonymous commenting will not be allowed. All comments will be subject to approval before posting, and may take up to 24 hours for approval to be granted.

We encourage civil discourse among readers, and ask that they be willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. No personal harassment or hate speech will be tolerated. Please be succinct and to the point. For longer comments, please consider submitting a letter to the editor instead. It will appear in both the print and online editions.

All comments will be reviewed, and we reserve the right to reject, edit or remove any comment for any reason. For questions or to express concerns feel free to contact our office at (802) 464-3388.