The motion was introduced on February 6 in response to concerns raised about a solar array on the landfill cap proposed by Green Lantern. At Tuesday’s meeting, Cohen said the motion for an RFP was retracted because the board had overlooked the fact that they had already signed an exclusivity option with Green Lantern.
Green Lantern’s director of project development Ralph Meima first proposed a feasibility study for a solar array in August. In October, he asked the board to enter into lease option agreement negotiations with Green Lantern, which the board agreed to do. In December, Meima said the feasibility study had been completed and that Green Lantern had found the site suitable for a 150 kW array and requested that the board go into lease negotiations with Green Lantern, which the board agreed to do.
But in January, the board received and read aloud a letter from Wayne Estey, who is the town’s zoning administrator and health administrator who later clarified he intended to submit the letter as a member of the public.
In his letter, Estey raised concerns about the proposed lease and whether the town could get a better deal. The board halted its lease negotiations and at its following meeting, decided to create an RFP for the landfill cap.
Though no matters pertaining to Green Lantern were on the agenda on Tuesday, Meima attended the meeting and spoke during the public comments period.
“Even though the solar project is not on the agenda, I’m here just in case any questions come up,” said Meima. “And I have a question, which is, is there a chance that it will be discussed during executive session at this meeting, or is it absolutely off the agenda today?”
“Apparently there are still things that our attorney is discussing with your attorney,” said Cohen. “So that’s where this is for now. As far as what happened at the last meeting with the RFP, that has been retracted because all of us failed to realize where we were. We already have an exclusivity option signed. So, we are not about to break that. That was an oversight. I will take blame for that. So now the attorneys will be talking.”
Cohen said that with Town Meeting impending, the matter will likely not be addressed again until the board’s March 20 meeting.