Board grapples with use rules for old high school
by Lauren Harkawik
Mar 15, 2017 | 3246 views | 0 0 comments | 18 18 recommendations | email to a friend | print
WILMINGTON- The Twin Valley School Board met for a special meeting on Wednesday night to discuss how to manage public use of the old high school building. The building has been closed to public use after business hours for several weeks, leaving several sports teams and other groups who routinely use the building without a place to practice or convene.

School board chair Seth Boyd said that the building was closed after business hours due to safety and security concerns that were brought up at a previous school board meeting. Windham Southwest Supervisory Union, which is a tenant of the building, has been managing the building voluntarily, but doing so has become challenging. Concerns have risen around the number of people who have keys to access the building, whether those keys are being shared, and whether key holders are using the building outside of the time they’ve been given permission to do so. Building users are also accessing areas of the building they don’t have permission to go in.

The major issues facing the board are how to manage the building after business hours and who should have access to the building. On the former, suggestions included hiring someone to manage comings and goings after business hours or using an electronic system to track who accesses the building and when. Patrice Schneider, who works as a real estate agent, said there are apps that grant access to keys, which track who uses a key and when. The board was open to the suggestion, and Roland Schneider said he would get more information on pricing.

The latter issue was more complicated. Attendees of the meeting, many of whom have been frozen out of the building while the board figures out what to do, asked whether some criteria could be laid out for who can use the building, such as relegating use to Wilmington and Whitingham residents only. WSWSU Business Manager Karen Atwood said that she asked the supervisory union’s lawyer whether criteria such as being a resident could be set forth, but she was told that could be viewed as discrimination. Recently, the board was faced with the possibility of a lawsuit when an individual said he was being discriminated against after being told he couldn’t join a private activity in the building.

Because the board hadn’t yet been officially sworn in following Town Meeting, the meeting was a discussion only. “We can’t take any action until we’re sworn in,” said Boyd. The board set goals of seeking further legal counsel for the discrimination issue, figuring out how to manage after-hours building use, and revisiting their policies and procedures about the building.

“The groups who are using it responsibly now, our goal is to get them back in as soon as possible,” said board member Kathy Larsen. “Hopefully we’ll be able to do that by next Tuesday’s board meeting.”
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet

Comment Policy

In an effort to promote reasoned discussion, transparency, and integrity in online commenting, The Deerfield Valley News requires anyone posting comments to identify themselves using their real name. Anonymous commenting will not be allowed. All comments will be subject to approval before posting, and may take up to 24 hours for approval to be granted.

We encourage civil discourse among readers, and ask that they be willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. No personal harassment or hate speech will be tolerated. Please be succinct and to the point. For longer comments, please consider submitting a letter to the editor instead. It will appear in both the print and online editions.

All comments will be reviewed, and we reserve the right to reject, edit or remove any comment for any reason. For questions or to express concerns feel free to contact our office at (802) 464-3388.