VPA rule hobbles hockey players
May 15, 2014 | 2817 views | 0 0 comments | 53 53 recommendations | email to a friend | print
To the Editor,

According to a recent widely published article, high school girl’s hockey in Vermont is in major decline. The Vermont Principal’s Association (VPA) and their coaches point to a laundry list of problems, yet are perplexed as to the root cause. I believe the VPA needs to point the finger at themselves. Their obsolete “Outside Team” rule has forced our state’s best female hockey players to leave and play elsewhere.

In Vermont and around the country, female youth hockey has experienced exponentially high growth over the last ten years, with lower but steady growth rates regionally over the last five. While girls youth hockey registrations are holding their own everywhere, and high school programs are growing, the decline in girl’s participation at high school is a uniquely Vermont problem.

The popularity of girl’s hockey has been greatly aided by the rise of women’s college hockey opportunities and the success of the US Olympic team. Unfortunately, Vermont players discovered that there were few college opportunities after high school. The problem? Unless they participated on “travel” teams, which is prohibited under the VPA’s rule, they likely won’t be recruited.

In 2008, the VPA was presented with the problem. Every Vermont high school athlete has the opportunity to fully participate on travel teams, except hockey. Why? Because hockey travel teams play during the same season as high school teams, and no other sport has that situation (except skiers, who are exempted). Importantly, most states don’t have the rule, and if they do, exempt female hockey players.

Unfortunately, the VPA upheld their rule and the decline that was warned about began. In seven years, at least 75 female players have left to play elsewhere. Our best players left for private schools, to the North American Hockey Academy in Stowe, and to join Rice High School’s prep team, a squad formed in the wake of the VPA’s decision.

I have three talented female hockey-playing daughters myself. Our oldest stayed in Vermont and never got recruited for college hockey, so we decided to send our next two away for high school. If they could have played on a travel team, we would have kept them here where they belong.

Sending our student-athletes away has done nothing good for Vermont. Their departure has decimated our high school hockey ranks, and we don’t get their contributions as athletes in other sports. We also have lost many students to the country’s best private schools, who otherwise would have made a positive academic and social impact on our schools. We must not forget the parents – who have to say goodbye to their kids and figure out how to pay tuition.

It will take years to repair the damage at the high school level. We can start to rebuild by changing the rule, or otherwise face the continued decline of girl’s hockey in Vermont.

Gary Marmer

Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet

Comment Policy

In an effort to promote reasoned discussion, transparency, and integrity in online commenting, The Deerfield Valley News requires anyone posting comments to identify themselves using their real name. Anonymous commenting will not be allowed. All comments will be subject to approval before posting, and may take up to 24 hours for approval to be granted.

We encourage civil discourse among readers, and ask that they be willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. No personal harassment or hate speech will be tolerated. Please be succinct and to the point. For longer comments, please consider submitting a letter to the editor instead. It will appear in both the print and online editions.

All comments will be reviewed, and we reserve the right to reject, edit or remove any comment for any reason. For questions or to express concerns feel free to contact our office at (802) 464-3388.