Development review board discusses property connected to Zoar interest
by By Jack Deming
Mar 26, 2014 | 4439 views | 1 1 comments | 85 85 recommendations | email to a friend | print
WILMINGTON- Cliff Duncan’s building at 36 West Main Street has been shuttered since Tropical Storm Irene, but with Zoar Outdoor expressing interest in the vacant red structure, Duncan was seeking the development review board’s approval for three permits at Monday night’s meeting.

Duncan was joined by Zoar owner Bruce Lessels, who explained the purpose of Zoar’s interest in the location as an “adventure center” for hiking, boating, and biking. Zoar will both sell and rent products, and since none will be used on the property, a recreational permit will not be necessary.

Duncan applied for the building to be granted conditional usage as a place of retail, which he feels, should be grandfathered in, as the building has served in a retail capacity on multiple occasions in the past. DRB chair Nicki Steel said that it was possible that the board would not be required to make a decision on this, as retail could very well be an existing conditional use, and rentals fall under the same category of providing goods and services to the public.

Duncan’s second application was for approval to make changes to the exterior of the building, which falls within the historic district, and thus constitutes a review by the DRB. Duncan’s plans call for moving the front door of the building to the right and installing four double-hung windows to its left. Duncan also plans to do work on the building’s roof, giving it a pitch change. Interior work will include a redesign of the roof supports, as well as a complete floor replacement. “There will be no posts and no partitions, to keep the inside open for however Bruce wants to set up his kiosks and space inside without any limitations,” said Duncan.

The third part of the hearing is where estimates come into play. Duncan’s building is in the flood fringe zone of the village and is therefore subject to certain rules dealing with improvements due to flood damage. If the estimated cost of repairing and improving the building is over 50% of its value, it will be required to undergo more costly flood repairs and improvements within one year, which may include raising the building’s first floor, and performing extensive flood-proofing. If the estimate is under 50%, another set of flood mitigation criteria apply and less costly repairs will need to be performed.

The building is valued at $75,000, according to the town’s lister’s maps, and Duncan’s estimates are just under the 50% cutoff of $37,500. But Duncan believes that the property value, and in turn the value of the building have been undervalued, and he and Lessels have an arm’s length agreement for Lessels to purchase it for $236,000.

“If we bring it back to a place where Bruce feels comfortable giving us $236,000, that clearly shows the building has to be worth more than considered in this application and this is a real challenge.” The DRB decided to recess the hearing to allow Duncan to have the building’s value reappraised.

Speaking as an interested party, Lisa Sullivan, co-chair of Wilmington Works, urged the board to consider the implications of a new business in the village. “I know that it’s not the criteria you’re basing a decision on, but post- Irene redevelopment is critical to the downtown and to property owners and residents,” said Sullivan. “This is not the type of business we’ve had before but it’s the type we would like to see.”

After the DRB makes its decision, all plans regarding renovations in the flood fringe area will need to be approved by the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources. If the application is approved, the ANR will have 30 days to respond with a decision.
Comments-icon Post a Comment
M Gilberg
March 28, 2014
Since the DRB has a past history of granting questionable permits why not add another one to the list.

The improvenment of this building will be a plus for the westerly entry to the historic downtown as will a new owner with an interest to create and grow a business. Or do people want to ccontinue to see a run down vacant building greeting visitors to the downtown and the new (albeit with a possibly low elevation) Reardon Crossing Bridge.

Comon guys, fudge it if need be.

Comment Policy

In an effort to promote reasoned discussion, transparency, and integrity in online commenting, The Deerfield Valley News requires anyone posting comments to identify themselves using their real name. Anonymous commenting will not be allowed. All comments will be subject to approval before posting, and may take up to 24 hours for approval to be granted.

We encourage civil discourse among readers, and ask that they be willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. No personal harassment or hate speech will be tolerated. Please be succinct and to the point. For longer comments, please consider submitting a letter to the editor instead. It will appear in both the print and online editions.

All comments will be reviewed, and we reserve the right to reject, edit or remove any comment for any reason. For questions or to express concerns feel free to contact our office at (802) 464-3388.