Weakening the USPS reduces the public's access
Jan 16, 2014 | 3346 views | 0 0 comments | 87 87 recommendations | email to a friend | print
To the Editor,

The United States Postal Service’s woes began when Congress mandated prefunding retiree health care benefits for 75 years in the future -- for workers not even born yet -- at a rate of $5.6 billion annually for 15 years. This prefunding coupled with the over payment of retirement accounts up to $75 billion, of which $11 billion is not disputed, and a cavernous recession rivaled only by the Great Depression in US history makes a recipe for disaster.

Ralph Nader states in a letter to Congressman Issa, the USPS is the only organization to be both a net creditor and receive no tax dollars. We would add unlike many large profitable American corporations, Apple for instance; designed in California, made in China, and tax sheltered the world over. ExxonMobil, Bank of America, Chevron -- to name a few -- all make billions of dollars and receive millions of dollars in tax refunds. Individual Americans paid $1.1 trillion in taxes in 2011, compared to $181 billion for corporations. It would appear the publicly-owned USPS is an overburdened cash cow of Congress, much like the individual taxpayer.

The USPS has chugged along for decades under the onerous burden of overpayment to the retirement accounts, like the little engine that could. It is a wonderful delivery system that reaches every address, 160 million, in the United States six days a week. As large as the USPS is, it embodies community spirit. The letter carrier, postal clerk, mail hander, and postmaster are repositories of local knowledge, a primary ingredient they add to processing mail. On September 11, 2001 we were considered to be the face of the ever functioning government, representing normalcy during the confusion of a national tragedy.

An unheralded fact, the USPS is our nation’s largest civilian employer of veterans, the disabled, and minorities. At last count over 130,000 veterans work for the Postal Service, with the wars in the Middle East coming to an end, many more will be sure to follow. Ironically for newly hired postal employees the USPS can’t afford to offer much in the way of benefits. There is a much reduced promise of health care benefits and no retirement package from the USPS until there is a full time opening. Many of these non-full time employees work in excess of 55 hours a week, with marginal health insurance coverage. New hires are critical to the USPS, both now and in the future. I can only hope the health care benefit they receive in retirement compensates for the unaffordable package the USPS offers in the interim.

Today there are members of Congress ready to dismantle the USPS without acknowledging the facts. This year the USPS earned a $600 million profit. The system is profitable because we go everywhere in the United States six days a week. Weakening service standards will cripple the ability to deliver in a timely manner to the American public’s door. Closing post offices and reducing hours -- limiting hours in the morning, noon time, and closing early -- reduce the public’s access and erode profitability. Eliminating the prefunding of future retirees’ health care benefits and returning over payments to the USPS for retirement accounts would keep the doors open at the USPS well into the future. It is not rocket science, it is common sense. It is time for Congress to act with reason and integrity and support America and her institutions.


Jill Charbonneau, Bill Creamer, Branch President National Postal Mail Handlers Union Local 301,

Andrew Tanger, Pres., Vermont Rural Letter Carriers’ Association,

Mary E. Nadeau, President, Vermont Federation of NARFE (National Active and Retired Federal Employees Assn.),

David Losito, President, American Postal Workers Union of Vermont

Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet

Comment Policy

In an effort to promote reasoned discussion, transparency, and integrity in online commenting, The Deerfield Valley News requires anyone posting comments to identify themselves using their real name. Anonymous commenting will not be allowed. All comments will be subject to approval before posting, and may take up to 24 hours for approval to be granted.

We encourage civil discourse among readers, and ask that they be willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. No personal harassment or hate speech will be tolerated. Please be succinct and to the point. For longer comments, please consider submitting a letter to the editor instead. It will appear in both the print and online editions.

All comments will be reviewed, and we reserve the right to reject, edit or remove any comment for any reason. For questions or to express concerns feel free to contact our office at (802) 464-3388.