Democracy built on respect
Feb 28, 2013 | 2937 views | 1 1 comments | 287 287 recommendations | email to a friend | print
“When, in some obscure country town, the farmers come together to a special Town Meeting, to express their opinion on some subject which

is vexing the land, that, I think, is the true Congress, and the most

respectable one that is ever assembled in the United States.”

Henry David Thoreau

It’s hard to find fault with the words of Thoreau. Even today, 159 years after he wrote the above comment, Town Meeting is still one of the purest forms of democracy in our country. In many ways the phrase above boils down the essence of Town Meeting. It’s a congress of peers, of unelected, ordinary men and women who will meet, debate, and come to a decision over the issues of their community.

While there are some noticeable changes from Thoreau’s day, most notably the inclusion of women and non-landholders in the democratic process, the essential elements of open floor debate and discussion, and then an up or down vote, carry on. Voters who feel strongly about an issue stand up, give their name for all to hear, and state their case. Those in the room are free to offer their own opinions in support or against the original position, and then a vote is taken.

That’s the great thing about local democracy in action. Not only do decisions get made, people remember their manners. In general people understand and respect those who may argue the other side of an article. Folks may not agree on issues, but they can all agree that they need to walk out of the room with a decision, and with the understanding they all live and work together in the same community.

In theory the US Congress is modeled after Town Meeting, where a deliberative body meets, makes arguments for or against a bill, and then votes.

Practical reality shows something very different. Instead of debating issues on the floor, positions are staked out on television news shows, web sites, and in social media. Decisions often get pushed off, left for another day or for someone else, generally after the next election.

Perhaps Congress would be wise to revisit the Town Meeting approach to solving issues. Instead of ad nauseum debate and posturing for the next election, get together and agree not to leave until the votes have been taken and the issue resolved. Then agree that regardless of the outcome, democracy had its way, and both winners and losers will respect the ultimate decision.

In that regard, perhaps what we have today, both in Congress and our community Town Meetings, is little different than what Thoreau observed a century and a half ago.
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Paul Hrabovsky
May 07, 2013
So is; The; 1st Amendment & THE second Amendment , in our Bill of Rights. If ? These ever get removed, good luck to everyone.

Comment Policy

In an effort to promote reasoned discussion, transparency, and integrity in online commenting, The Deerfield Valley News requires anyone posting comments to identify themselves using their real name. Anonymous commenting will not be allowed. All comments will be subject to approval before posting, and may take up to 24 hours for approval to be granted.

We encourage civil discourse among readers, and ask that they be willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. No personal harassment or hate speech will be tolerated. Please be succinct and to the point. For longer comments, please consider submitting a letter to the editor instead. It will appear in both the print and online editions.

All comments will be reviewed, and we reserve the right to reject, edit or remove any comment for any reason. For questions or to express concerns feel free to contact our office at (802) 464-3388.