Two towns working to resolve land issues
by Jack Deming
Oct 11, 2012 | 1437 views | 0 0 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
READSBORO-The selectboard discussed a request from the town of Stamford to find a solution for properly taxing properties that lie partially in each town. The majority of the land parcels are located in Alpenwald Village, and Readsboro Lister Larry Hopkins cited between 15 and 20 properties that are in conflict.

In a letter, Stamford Selectboard chair Eunice Rice said recent tax mapping by Readsboro and multiple tax auctions for single lots are causing concern. In the letter she cites lot 15 as an example. “(Lot 15) is mainly in Stamford and has historically been taxed by Stamford. Readsboro has also included this lot in its tax base, and (has been) charging taxes on it. Due to nonpayment of taxes, both Stamford and Readsboro held a tax sale on lot 15. Stamford was successful in finding a buyer, but Readsboro claims ownership.”

Another example is the town line splitting individual properties into both towns, as in the case of lot 16. “The size of the lot is 3.8 acres,” writes Rice. “According to its split by the town line, Stamford has historically taxed on 2.8 acres and Readsboro on one acre. After Readsboro’s tax mapping, Readsboro is taxing on 4.4 acres. Add that to Stamford’s 2.8, and the owner is being taxed on 7.2 acres, not 3.8.”

Readsboro Selectboard member Teddy Hopkins voiced concern over the current methods that have led to the confusion. “In the past there has been this informal handshake between the listers, and either Readsboro or Stamford would not tax a lot if the other had the majority of the land. The point is, if it’s a one-acre lot and both towns are taxing on one acre then there’s obviously something wrong.”

Hopkins also expressed the need for a permanent solution by calculating exactly how much each town will tax based upon acreage. “If you split a property and Stamford says it’s one acre and we (Readsboro) say it’s one acre and we all know it’s wrong, if they sell the portion in Stamford it doesn’t mean they get one acre, they get whatever it is. So people who say they bought one acre in Stamford at a tax sale, and an acre in Readsboro, the tax sale doesn’t guarantee the acreage.”

Teddy and Larry Hopkins were chosen to represent the town of Readsboro, and will begin discussions with Stamford’s listers and selectboard as to how to move forward with a concrete solution.
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet

Comment Policy

In an effort to promote reasoned discussion, transparency, and integrity in online commenting, The Deerfield Valley News requires anyone posting comments to identify themselves using their real name. Anonymous commenting will not be allowed. All comments will be subject to approval before posting, and may take up to 24 hours for approval to be granted.

We encourage civil discourse among readers, and ask that they be willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. No personal harassment or hate speech will be tolerated. Please be succinct and to the point. For longer comments, please consider submitting a letter to the editor instead. It will appear in both the print and online editions.

All comments will be reviewed, and we reserve the right to reject, edit or remove any comment for any reason. For questions or to express concerns feel free to contact our office at (802) 464-3388.