Readsboro secretary is not at fault for missing funds
Feb 03, 2014 | 2619 views | 1 1 comments | 42 42 recommendations | email to a friend | print
To the Editor,

At the January 27 legal proceedings in Bennington, there was a suggestion by Mr. Michael Heller’s attorney, David Silver, that someone else was responsible for some missing school lunch funds at the Readsboro Central School. Mr. Silver said that there no evidence to show that Heller took it, and that the person who was responsible for that money should be the prime suspect.

The fact that there may be no concrete evidence in the investigation regarding school lunch money should by no means imply that Readsboro school secretary Patricia Kidney had anything to do with the missing funds.

A parent from Readsboro phoned me to say how very concerned she was that Mrs. Kidney might be inappropriately under suspicion for taking those missing funds and asked if I would contact The Deerfield Valley News and make a statement to the fact of her innocence. I can say with 100% conviction that I and the business manager do not believe that Mrs. Kidney had anything to do with those missing funds. I do not believe that any member of the Readsboro School Board questions Mrs. Kidney’s integrity either.

Richard McClements, Ed.D.

Interim Superintendent, Windham Southwest Supervisory Union


Comments-icon Post a Comment
Wayne Andrews
February 03, 2014
If Ms. Kidney believed Heller was taking lunch money in the school year of 2012-2013 then how can Dr. McClements make Kidney invisible when Dr. McClements did not become Superintendent until the summer of 2013?

Why did not Ms. Kidney make her thoughts known to superiors?

Comment Policy

In an effort to promote reasoned discussion, transparency, and integrity in online commenting, The Deerfield Valley News requires anyone posting comments to identify themselves using their real name. Anonymous commenting will not be allowed. All comments will be subject to approval before posting, and may take up to 24 hours for approval to be granted.

We encourage civil discourse among readers, and ask that they be willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. No personal harassment or hate speech will be tolerated. Please be succinct and to the point. For longer comments, please consider submitting a letter to the editor instead. It will appear in both the print and online editions.

All comments will be reviewed, and we reserve the right to reject, edit or remove any comment for any reason. For questions or to express concerns feel free to contact our office at (802) 464-3388.