Proposal would expand Mount Snow Airport, keep FAA license active
by Mike Eldred
Sep 06, 2012 | 4669 views | 5 5 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DOVER- Selectboard members heard a pitch for the revitalization of Mount Snow Airport from Haystack developer Jim Barnes at their meeting Tuesday. Barnes requested a $600,000 low-interest, five-year loan from the town to fund a portion of the estimated $1 million project.

Barnes, who said he recently entered into an agreement with the owner of the airport, told board members that there is an opportunity for the Deerfield Valley community to “reclaim the airport” and extend the current runway for larger aircraft. “As it stands today, there’s an opportunity to create an airport that will change the valley once and for all,” Barnes said. “Having a commercially viable airport would provide economic value across multiple businesses in the valley.”

Barnes said that commercial small jet traffic, mainly corporate, charter, and fractional-ownership jet aircraft, would increase property values and result in an increase in spending at local restaurants, inns, and shops. In other resort areas, Barnes said, having an airport large enough for small jet traffic has led to higher property values. And if Mount Snow Airport were to be refurbished it would be, by far, the closest airport to any resort in Vermont. “We would have an airport one mile from Haystack and one mile from Mount Snow.”

The close proximity to the resort as well as the resort’s short flight time from major East Coast commuter hub airports like Teterboro, NJ, Long Island and Westchester, NY, and Hartford, CT, would attract corporate traffic, Barnes said. “Mount Snow Airport is 22 to 34 minutes from these airports,” Barnes said. “It would open up an opportunity for people that would come to the valley for corporate events and outings. Some people would use their vacation homes more or purchase one because of the accessibility. It would open up the possibility of commercial seasonal routes.”

But the current airport, with its approximately 1,900-foot runway is too short, isn’t currently operating commercially, Barnes said, and is slated to be discontinued as an FAA-licensed facility. Barnes proposed a $1 million upgrade, which would include $400,000 for increasing the runway length to 4,400 feet, $200,000 for lighting upgrades, $200,000 for a new hanger, and $200,000 for terminal improvements. To pay for a portion of the construction, Barnes asked for a $600,000 low-interest, five-year loan from Dover. He told board members he also planned to ask Wilmington for a $200,000 low-interest, five-year loan, as well as the transfer of town-owned land on the southern end of the airport. Barnes said the money would be repaid through the collection of landing and hangar fees.

But board member Randy Terk, who was on vacation and participating by Skype, said Dover had no program from which they could lend money. “Our economic development plan doesn’t have a program for loans, grants or public assistance,” he said. “If we decide to entertain a lending program, we have to come up with a scope, and we haven’t even thought about it. It may be in our interest to consider for the future, but I don’t see it happening any time soon.”

Board member Vicki Capitani said she’d like to see the proposal broadened to include the Brattleboro Development Credit Corporation and other local communities. “Stratton would benefit, too, not just Wilmington and Dover. It’s a regional project.”

Dover resident Don Albano warned that a larger airport would forever change the area, something he had seen as a developer in Florida. “I appreciate the facts and figures Jim has given, but I would like to put a little water on the enthusiasm,” he said. “It will change the town of Dover, and it will change the region. You need to decide whether you want to change.”

Albano said the increase in air traffic would have an impact on the quality of life. “Even now, on weekends, whenever that guy takes off in a two-engine plane and flies over my house, I wish I had anti-aircraft guns. When the C-5s (military cargo planes) fly over my house, I say hello to the pilot and he says hello to me. When you bring in these small airliners and private jets, the experience we have in Dover now is going to be taken away. All of Country Club Road and Crosstown Road are going to be affected by the noise.”

But Albano said it was a difficult decision for the town. “It’s a dilemma because I think Jim is absolutely correct. Mount Snow will get small airlines to come in with groups, and that’s good for business. But I’m really wary about the affect it will have on the residential population north and south, east and west of the airport.”

Albano suggested the board form a working group to study the expansion and impacts.

In other economic development news, Ken Black reported that second quarter tax revenue was down sharply, 27% below last year. “Hopefully this isn’t representative of what we’re going to see for the rest of the year,” he said.

“Well, there was an abrupt and early end to the ski season,” said Capitani.
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Chris Helmstetter
September 20, 2012

In other economic development news, Ken Black reported that second quarter tax revenue was down sharply, 27% below last year. “Hopefully this isn’t representative of what we’re going to see for the rest of the year,” he said.

“Well, there was an abrupt and early end to the ski season,” said Capitani.

I hope the Board and Ken Black review the data that I presented them weeks ago on the inaccurate analysis of the past quarters.
Nancy Morris
September 07, 2012
The Valley Trail is served by many each year as a tranquil hiking trail . . . where one can find peace and quiet . . . as is much of our area in Vermont. Having aircraft buzzing overhead will take away the very reason people seek out this area. It's already disruptive when the sightseeing plane flies low and often while out on runs. Leave the airport as is.
M Gilberg
September 07, 2012
If the Wilmington Selectboard are stupid enough to sell this fellow the land on the South side of the airport which he needs to extend the runways to accomodate his plans for private jet and commercial traffic, no one in the Valley will have the ability to stop or even limit his ruinatious plans as total control of the airport will then rest solely with him and the FAA, and neither of them will be concerned with the peace, tranquility and quality of life in the Valley.

M Gilberg
September 06, 2012
As someone who lives part of the year in a southern municipality which boasts one of the busiest general aviation airports in the nation, I can warn Valley residents that the quickest way to ruin the beauty and quiet of the Valley is for the Town of Wilmington to sell acreage owned by it to developer Barnes to enable him to lengthen the runways at his Mount Snow Airport to allow corporate and small commercial jets to access the airport.

With the coming of "personal" multi-million dollar jets, not to mention "small" commercial jet aircraft, comes the screaming that these aircraft bring on each takeoff and landing and with them the peace, quiet and tranquility of the Valley will be forever adversely affected. Indeed, only through restricting runway length through zoning, but more readily, the refusal to sell land by Barnes to accomplish his stated desire will the Dover and Wilmington Selectboards be able to limit and restrict development of Barnes' aerodrome.

As for Barnes' request for loans to develop and expand the airport, each Board should protect taxpayer funds from this scheme. Mr. Barnes has ready access to conventional lenders, if he so desires, and should do so to meet his development projects.

Alan Morris
September 07, 2012
With respect to Mr. Barnes, who is doing great things with Haystack Mountain and golf course, there is a reason that airports are sited in remote, industrial zones, far from residential areas, especially areas of larger homes. While a larger, commercial airport will likely benefit the greater region, it will forever change the peace and beauty of the local community of West Dover. Homeowners (taxpayers)with significant investments near the how tiny airport stand to lose bigtime, not only where quality of life is concerned, but in declining property values as well.

I'm no pilot, but I've often thought of the danger in piloting a plane in winter conditions that impact the Mt. Snow airport, let alone the high winds that frequent our locality year-round. But that's another topic for those who know more of aviation.

The primary concern for, and the reason we must reject airport expansion is that it forever degrades quality of life for West Dover.

Comment Policy

In an effort to promote reasoned discussion, transparency, and integrity in online commenting, The Deerfield Valley News requires anyone posting comments to identify themselves using their real name. Anonymous commenting will not be allowed. All comments will be subject to approval before posting, and may take up to 24 hours for approval to be granted.

We encourage civil discourse among readers, and ask that they be willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. No personal harassment or hate speech will be tolerated. Please be succinct and to the point. For longer comments, please consider submitting a letter to the editor instead. It will appear in both the print and online editions.

All comments will be reviewed, and we reserve the right to reject, edit or remove any comment for any reason. For questions or to express concerns feel free to contact our office at (802) 464-3388.