Hall abutters cool to DRB deck decision
by Jack Deming
Oct 10, 2013 | 5834 views | 2 2 comments | 167 167 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The east-facing side of Memorial Hall abuts the Crafts Inn property.
The east-facing side of Memorial Hall abuts the Crafts Inn property.
WILMINGTON-What started as an attempt to install a heating and air conditioning unit at Memorial Hall has turned into a point of controversy. Two abutters have filed an environmental court appeal of a September 24 Development Review Board decision that would allow the construction of a 10-by-30-foot HVAC deck unit on the back of the building. The abutters, Crafts Inn to the east, and Cindy Beaudette, owner of The Incurable Romantic, to the west, claim that the town did not properly inform all abutters of the DRB meeting, which stopped important issues from being raised.

Alice Richter, manager of Crafts Inn, says that she did not receive a notice from the town and was therefore unable to attend and be an interested party, something she says she would never miss. “I’ve been here for 30 years,” said Richter. “I would never not go to something that affects Crafts Inn.”

Richter says that not being notified about the meeting prevented her from attending and explaining her objection to a plan that consists of a 15-foot steel deck, housing two HVAC units, its metal supports grounded in frost- and flood-proof cement. While she supports upgrading the old hall, the aesthetics of the project is what Richter is most concerned about. “I’m not against Memorial Hall, it’s more a part of Crafts Inn than anything because it was built by the same people,” said Richter. “It’s also a beautiful building, and to see a structure of those dimensions is ugly. It will not be seen by people in the front but will be by people on the Valley Trail and my customers.”

Through the appeal, Richter and Beaudette are hoping to have the DRB case reopened so there can be conversation about the plan.

According to town manager Scott Murphy, who is also manager of town-owned properties including the hall, letters were sent to all abutters, a notice was published in the newspaper, and notices were posted in three public places in town. On October 1, town lawyer Bob Fisher filed a motion to dismiss the abutters’ appeal, saying the public was properly notified of the hearing. Murphy says the town is not legally obligated to use registered mail for notifying residents of meetings.

The HVAC unit is the town’s only option for putting in a much-needed heating system, according to Murphy. During Tropical Storm Irene, flooding in the basement of Memorial Hall reached nine feet in some places, and destroyed the previous unit. “Our options are limited” said Murphy. “We can put it where it’s designed to be, which allows for ongoing use of property under the structure, or put it in the basement and elevate it. We try to keep nothing of value there now, and I doubt any insurers would cover the unit being down there again.

“What we’re hoping for is, at the conclusion of the legal process, we can sit down and work something out, because we want to be good neighbors,” said Murphy.

But one neighbor, Cindy Beaudette, sees the project, along with the majority of work done on the exterior of the building, as a personal liability. While the town owns the building, it does not own the land to the east and west of it, and only a 10-foot setback to the rear. The front lawn of the building is also considered a right of way for both the Crafts Inn and Incurable Romantic, and used to be the entry point for trucks servicing the building. According to Beaudette, the lack of setbacks causes a dangerous situation for her as a property owner.

“If snow comes off the roof and kills somebody, or their car is demolished, or someone falls from a ladder, it’s my problem and my liability,” said Beaudette, who used to chair the Memorial Hall committee. “The town is increasing the liability by building something that has to be serviced in the back and has no way to service it without traversing my and Crafts Inn’s property.” Beaudette was unable to attend the DRB meeting for personal reasons.

Technically, service trucks approaching the proposed area of the HVAC deck cannot reach it without entering Beaudette’s property, which includes a portion of the parking lot that stretches to Crafts Inn in the rear.

The problem goes back more than100 years when Memorial Hall was sold to the town, but not the land to the east or west. When Beaudette acquired her building, she says she also acquired an agreement that allowed Crafts Inn to rent five parking spaces behind Memorial Hall.

Those spaces will be under the proposed HVAC unit when it is installed. A gridwork was installed under the grass in the front of the building as well as a fence and gate, which Beaudette says closed off the right of way along with the use of the front of the building as its service entrance. According to Beaudette, workers on site use the Incurable Romantic driveway, without realizing it is part of her property and not the town’s.

Most recently, construction vehicles showed up to deliver building supplies for the project, according to Richter, causing concerns that cars would be damaged by a boom truck.

But Beaudette is also concerned about the town’s assertion that the HVAC deck would not be an addition to the building or change its blueprint. Joseph Cincotta, the architect of the project, told the DRB at the meeting in August that the unit was nothing more than a mechanical accoutrement, not an addition. “Not by any stretch of code is this an addition,” said Cincotta. “If the air-conditioning unit was on the ground as they often are, it would not be considered an addition, so if you choose to be conservative and more restrictive that way it would be an unusual decision.”

The only right of way the town has to the building is the shared front of the building, and a small portion of land connected to the Crafts Inn property, which allows access to the hall’s basement.

The appeal process could take months and jeopardize coming events at Memorial Hall that would need heat, including a quilt show and a wedding slated for January.
Comments-icon Post a Comment
M Gilberg
October 10, 2013
Why does the Town Manager insist on hiring the same architectural firm that created the controversy which almost tore the Town apart during the Bank Lot Park affair. Remember, the park with the non-compliant ADA handicapped ramp, with the morphing pergola, and the now rotting "rot resistant" Amerivan Elm uprights supporting the Pergola?

Who designs an addition to a building without first determining site access or at least getting the input of abutters and others in the Historic District who will be exposed on a daily basis to the noise and lack of aesthetics connected with this addition. Does the Town Manager and the Architect think that its proper to wilfully trespass on the property of others whether for the delivery of materials, the access of construction workers, or for service, repair or replacement of equipment, or will the abutters be forced to seek redress with the State Police?

Additionally, I can't buy Mr. Murphy's excuse that there is no other method, other than employment of this ugly, inappropriate addition in the heart of the Historic District, to provide HVAC service to our Hall. I'd question whether a creative HVAC contractor given tight paramaters, wouldn't be able to devise a scheme which works without trespassing on others property.

Go figure how Wilmington treats its citizens and spends their tax money.
Robert Hebert
October 10, 2013
You are nothing but a trouble maker, Chap914, 'anti-man' for sure. A thorn in the sides of all progressive, productive and peaceful individuals...

(AND a Big Chicken hiding behind your mask all these years.)

It's time you 'cease and desist' for good!

Comment Policy

In an effort to promote reasoned discussion, transparency, and integrity in online commenting, The Deerfield Valley News requires anyone posting comments to identify themselves using their real name. Anonymous commenting will not be allowed. All comments will be subject to approval before posting, and may take up to 24 hours for approval to be granted.

We encourage civil discourse among readers, and ask that they be willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. No personal harassment or hate speech will be tolerated. Please be succinct and to the point. For longer comments, please consider submitting a letter to the editor instead. It will appear in both the print and online editions.

All comments will be reviewed, and we reserve the right to reject, edit or remove any comment for any reason. For questions or to express concerns feel free to contact our office at (802) 464-3388.